Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wqK-007axy-SF for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:05:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wqJ-004euy-Fo for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:05:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wqJ-004euo-7y for pgsql-odbc@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:05:31 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wqG-007lWw-GO for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:05:30 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50bbd9cf923so495348e87.1 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:05:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701173127; x=1701777927; darn=postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6Uv9p1aZ31xE8OwDd2HFCxEzdUE2D0b0NcYeQ9ioc1E=; b=Xs1bwsoLmI6FaCvoLUZTBU1IuH8PZ+KCElbqzxbW2vi2s4lPYTCqgNvnHfD9iVHWM1 CZxWmuri74ZU2C/UfE649IViXEKxnoqC16E0e1fNFHRBK74/YHGm96Q8y+wknoX3z13J n9Qf+2xZIEPcmjqC9mZn1q5ZBhApLsO++LzKMlRiC0SQ88hBxPgQ5ad7UMaQosLIUKuU R1ORDHTVgZGWtdjJ09gKfxCnveCTHqnOQD4AvTZhs3Mw0ILvfe23T2yE+WMpUJ4L4cId r6SUGqkiVjqkN4Tn53JJ+xNj2PQdXIT2ck6Hw+DCb14t5Qa+JrNBNL7yeDWyfpxvTKew Fm4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701173127; x=1701777927; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6Uv9p1aZ31xE8OwDd2HFCxEzdUE2D0b0NcYeQ9ioc1E=; b=bvvvoBTcF/HA1SU0vjbxdWFnsMy5jHxi8jPU5cpJQnGjogj2SM0T3yyeg+J3ikXkTC +WUSnzYJnHcVODswwtUsCsrqtTm10Tb9303jv2oLJodl2u6kGTV3pT+CnpBfadsLCKaq f17duKojsiWP1NiuXtx2q3rLZyMhBsdN0GFYCjOAV4cyQAOgrPFR/KxSeOh3F9nw0DZ/ 3Nzvrn1CO9depLSyufPKsODnV37JDa79ZsgCxPVd7FJ/dsQObZaWIsty/Py9UWVLCDiK U2RdLKsKPqyTD1d8CH42Zs0YbK/3J4Lp3mSyOF5j3WU7aP0CV894Fr/yeSM9TpjQEiUh 5GQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxu75wy85E0MGqzS8nVn4i2AGt0lSnM96NPuxUMHe34sxkXj1l9 FSY8ib2O8WQav8IIQeAvo6+IQyvZEy/Tf+JuzH+wQDjR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE2i1jDdA1Xvjrb4Yx9y14rfEw6x0Qu8GFbf3T+GVjdmyZU+1hGMU28ICMF7U3ihJKA1eud5mb9kb5Wdu2Vjq8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:923:b0:50a:71e1:e1c9 with SMTP id f3-20020a056512092300b0050a71e1e1c9mr7437425lft.42.1701173126562; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:05:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Chirag Karkera Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:35:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issue with the existing psqlodbc version of upgraded instance To: Dave Cramer Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e907f9060b353ba3" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000e907f9060b353ba3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, Thank You for your email. Much appreciated ! Thank You and Take care ! Regards, Chirag Karkera On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:24=E2=80=AFPM Dave Cramer wrote: > Hi Chirag, > > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 03:19, Chirag Karkera > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> We have upgraded the RDS database version from v13.10 to v15.4 >> >> The current odbc version we are using is below, >> Name : postgresql-odbc >> Version : 09.03.0100 >> Release : 2.el7 >> Architecture: x86_64 >> >> Do we have any specific matrix where we can check the compatibility >> issue. >> > > 09.03.0100 is almost 10 years old PostgreSQL: File Browser > > > While we don't have a compatibility matrix generally speaking you should > be using the latest version of the driver. My recommendation is that you > upgrade to at least 15.0 if not 16.0 > > Regards, > Dave Cramer > >> --000000000000e907f9060b353ba3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dave,=C2=A0

Thank You for your email= .=C2=A0

Much=C2=A0appreciated !

Thank You and Take care !

Regards,
Chirag Karkera=C2=A0

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:24=E2=80=AFPM Dave = Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks> wrote:
Hi Chirag,




On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 03:19, Chirag Karkera= <chiragkrk= r102@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Team,=C2=A0

We have upgraded the RDS database version from v13.10 to v15.4=C2=A0=

The current odbc version we are using is below,= =C2=A0
Name=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : postgresql-odbc
Version=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 09.03.0100
Release=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0: 2.el7
Architecture: x86_64

=
Do we have any specific=C2=A0matrix where we can check the compatibili= ty issue.=C2=A0

09.03.010= 0 is almost 10 years old=C2=A0PostgreSQL: File Browser
<= br>
While we don't have a compatibility matrix generally spea= king you should be using the latest version of the driver. My recommendatio= n is that you upgrade to at least 15.0 if not 16.0

Regards,
Dave Cramer
--000000000000e907f9060b353ba3--