MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joan <aseques@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:41:06 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAP4s+CEKR7snte0nncVv9ABZXX_mwmCMotibYzJtTCruk8apdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Diferences between mimalloc and regular releases?
To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026b4b2062f86f114"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAP4s%2BCEKR7snte0nncVv9ABZXX_mwmCMotibYzJtTCruk8apdg%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--00000000000026b4b2062f86f114
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I am looking into the best version of the ODBC to install in a current
system (windows server 2019 to a posgres 17 server). I've seen on the
relelases site here (https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/releases/), that
there are two different versions of the odbc:
- standard one
- mimalloc for better memory management

It seems to came from here
https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/pull/14
Are there any inconvenients with the mimalloc version or should be the
preferred in case of doubt?

--00000000000026b4b2062f86f114
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I am looking into the best version of the ODBC to ins=
tall in a current system (windows server 2019 to a posgres 17 server). I=
9;ve seen on the relelases site here (<a href=3D"https://www.postgresql.org=
/ftp/odbc/releases/">https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/releases/</a>), th=
at there are two different versions of the odbc:</div><div>- standard one</=
div><div>- mimalloc for better memory management</div><div><br></div><div>I=
t seems to came from here <a href=3D"https://github.com/postgresql-interfac=
es/psqlodbc/pull/14">https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/pull=
/14</a></div><div>Are there any inconvenients with the mimalloc version or =
should be the preferred in case of doubt?</div></div>

--00000000000026b4b2062f86f114--