Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pS6iD-00089n-Kr for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:35:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pS6iC-000840-He for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:35:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pS6iB-00083r-CC for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:35:56 +0000 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pS6i8-00061X-4M for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:35:54 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEB65C0037; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:35:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:35:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aklaver.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1676424949; x= 1676511349; bh=V3UMzC/grQBq7orEpsRlcn6WNSWzNko7xXzIbHIr6XA=; b=d BodEw/mkEof/JqB5UTAAhBkYG1R3ygkZYo5cu1J9rOW+fbaIn1HWMrrHC6zNaxrl VErISI5jn96ZPPDTZlbbE0bUbP+a99ypkDinH2i2xIGaXqh3CYdvf50NgMvktAsW hRMTKDtITEwtVOHWNc7GcnjZRJhrcsQFEnPPGlOY8f5UETLAQk7MRrgnIve441zO Faw/7CFsWgS1xQsbeK31FPuj1DYRCrkEUgkW26UMtwXmyYSmnrpZs3BGV6HEUF+F sBiiYJkBbpBv5/1L5d6xuz6wtvNtmud0t2SHjrDiwgRsPdO+jhZFyfQP9fXjlmG4 KY8By3EqZaXvzukDUXEXA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676424949; x=1676511349; bh=V 3UMzC/grQBq7orEpsRlcn6WNSWzNko7xXzIbHIr6XA=; b=bSnwLl/TQVAQL2H6w z3NbczjI92i8iRGAa2xNTp6OnOzotqn1fRF4Fc6MmBDQJdP0luxwCXdhW+oPHRjR QqCsy433w6s5iUNWWpYI7xFO0yT0jIFI1rauEcqNmIraEObPHPpW0Z3Hqdut+aq0 //myUUGOjX8NS5ZExw2c9nkMFRQSPCESQ+2S/eIDGGiq5UyDokY1HQY6mVpKXAQE QHS2kswoDjFcUno5xHdNtHUuujommdHgu5ty+wypUX9NKoxNq2lAHzQh4gpxcefh vZdb/s2kqdZ0vvikwSw7zFEwzMH3Oe0j2mCvi75+W/aooLYgblUPv3l5XkQUNpU4 3YA9g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeigedgfeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheptegurhhi rghnucfmlhgrvhgvrhcuoegrughrihgrnhdrkhhlrghvvghrsegrkhhlrghvvghrrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugfeuleegveffhfegleejhefhtedtgeeileeggfeh fefffeevgeejtdeutefftdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpegrughrihgrnhdrkhhlrghvvghrsegrkhhlrghvvghrrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i76984098:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:35:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:35:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: Quoting issue from ODBC To: Brad White , "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" References: Content-Language: en-US From: Adrian Klaver In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2/14/23 14:58, Brad White wrote: > > Are these UPDATE's actually necessary? > > In other words has nobody noticed a problem with the data over that > time frame? > > I don't know what to make of it. > I had the same question you did. > > I now have proof that these hundreds of errors are not an issue. > The postgres logs in pg_log clearly show an error, but the errors never > show up in the Access log. Then either: 1) They are not coming from Access. 2) Or indirectly from Access, which kicks off some other code that is not logged. In either case they seem to be surplus to requirements. In other words cruft that is not actually relevant to the application. > That means that Access didn't get an error back. > Further, I have evidence that the values are actually getting updated. > The financial balances are all correct. > Issues that were closed are all closed, etc. > Even though the Access log says the statement was only run once and > Postgres says ERROR, I see no other evidence of it. > I can't fathom how that can happen. > > ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > On the other hand, there are some real errors in the log. I'll put that > in another post. > > Brad -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com