Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC14F6501CA; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:39:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46709-05; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:39:46 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.23]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4071064FCFD; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:39:48 -0300 (ADT) X-Trace: 149342350/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/f2s-temporary-group/85.211.229.155 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 85.211.229.155 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: simon@2ndquadrant.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcBAPDIiUhV0+Wb/2dsb2JhbAAIsBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,253,1215385200"; d="scan'208";a="149342350" X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from 85-211-229-155.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk (HELO [192.168.0.3]) ([85.211.229.155]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2008 20:39:45 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode From: Simon Riggs To: Martin Zaun Cc: Bruce Momjian , Heikki Linnakangas , Andrew Dunstan , Dave Page , List pgsql-patches , PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <48867904.9090001@sun.com> References: <200807011520.m61FKhZ20311@momjian.us> <48867904.9090001@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:46:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1217015178.3894.992.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200807/1207 X-Sequence-Number: 121467 On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote: > reviewing your patch Current status is this: * My understanding is that Dave and Andrew (and therefore Simon) think the approach proposed here is an acceptable one. Heikki disagrees and wants different approach. Perhaps I misunderstand. * Patch needs work to complete the proposed approach * I'm willing to change the patch, but not able to test it on Windows. Is there someone able to test the patch, if I make the changes? If not, we should just kick this out of the CommitFest queue now and be done. If nobody cares enough about this issue to test a fix, we shouldn't bother. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support