X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F52011F60E8 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:02:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52581-02 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:02:14 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B9511F6911 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:02:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3RN268A016484; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:02:07 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Theo Schlossnagle , josh.berkus@sun.com, robert.lor@sun.com, PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 In-reply-to: <200604272231.k3RMVYM28488@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200604272231.k3RMVYM28488@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:31:34 -0400" Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:02:06 -0400 Message-ID: <16483.1146178926@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200604/238 X-Sequence-Number: 19510 Bruce Momjian writes: > Great, changes attached and applied. I removed the solaris_i386 and > solaris_x86_64.s files and made just one solaris_x86.s. I updated the > build system to use the new file, updated the macros, and added some > documentation on the approach. Thanks. BTW, on the replacement of ldstub with cas: according to what I find in google, cas does not exist on pre-V9 SPARCs. Are we sure no one uses sparc v8 chips anymore? Is there any actual advantage to making that change? regards, tom lane