Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036DC650E7F for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:03:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91089-03 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:03:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFA4650E23 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:03:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so484772ywj.73 for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=SKK8DJJjJ4V98WdbH2bHLveKE2JR/UbASX41elKqGPk=; b=OjypcKsL3GLT0jHieI1ZhHDZDPB9G8BZCttOwho6I7bOTYVnKx891RBxI+OWMoWSea 7Dv2rqcNY1bdi07PCpjpxpykE/KKHYUG4bSE56O1ekF7AzagHm1siC+jmrAtcUZaxPce QqWIKIbGR7il9ssmYdN6jGgSSEuoXtW/UuC6E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=E2NRK35W6VTPzRIwnEGQCeXhmVYK+/PIQ8+Mp13+KLfVLZg/Au8uOCFJrE30WjP/AS nAxDrPDmgbyzi+iNbh9hiOTm3MlPnhmEfwl662+N0v/JO/seh0iXiNctdVug0Ij1UGok N2xpdy7LvXKmPzk664CYsNzZTZCh1OZguOU4M= Received: by 10.151.148.2 with SMTP id a2mr1595237ybo.0.1215162221258; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.84.7 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2e78013d0807040203m268ae3a7kdbe65a9695aa7365@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:33:41 +0530 From: "Pavan Deolasee" To: "Zdenek Kotala" Subject: Re: page macros cleanup Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" , PostgreSQL-patches In-Reply-To: <486DE16C.3070705@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48529B83.9010907@sun.com> <486CDC83.7060609@enterprisedb.com> <486DE16C.3070705@sun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/47 X-Sequence-Number: 6742 On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Patch > modifies HashMaxItemSize. It should require reindex on all hash indexes. > Should we bump catalog version? > Do we really need that ? Even if the new HashMaxItemSize comes out to be lower than the current limit (because of MAXALIGN), I don't see how existing hash indexes can have a larger item than the new limit. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com