X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480DD9FA4DE for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:58:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70316-05 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:58:47 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from projects.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522BF9FA3A3 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:58:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by projects.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k45GwXJa029024; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:33 -0700 Message-ID: <445B8436.3050000@commandprompt.com> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 09:58:30 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: Robert Lor , Tom Lane , Theo Schlossnagle , Josh.Berkus@Sun.COM, PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 References: <200605051624.k45GOMQ00636@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200605051624.k45GOMQ00636@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (projects.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 05 May 2006 09:58:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/65 X-Sequence-Number: 19611 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Lor wrote: >> Bruce, the change was only needed for the SPARC version only. The x86 >> file worked just fine before and needs to be reverted back. Yes, they >> are different. > > OK, fixed, thanks. > >> Apologies if the message was not clear the first time! > > Yes, you were clear, but it was so illogical I figured it must be both > platforms. :-0 Don't blame x86 for SPARCs sillyness, that just isn't fair ;) Joshua D. Drake > > I added a comment to clarify. This was the way the comments were in > 8.1.X. > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/