Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CCA64FCF2
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:11:09 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 45151-02
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:11:06 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B59B664FCBC
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:11:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail 16426 invoked by uid 512); 26 Nov 2008 05:11:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (100.0.32.251)
	by sd2.tpf-fw-c.co.jp with SMTP; 26 Nov 2008 05:11:01 -0000
Message-ID: <492CDA62.306@tpf.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:10:58 +0900
From: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp>
CC: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
References: <20081125173024.7B45.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp>
	<68B4047E859E4A4C97FAC4077F23DDFA@HIRO57887DE653>
	<20081126114014.7D90.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20081126114014.7D90.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.125 tagged_above=0 required=5
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=2.125
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Archive-Number: 200811/1698
X-Sequence-Number: 128410

井上です。

ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> 
>> Um, It was not supported. 
>> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/LC_TIME_PATCH/ITAGAKI_PATCH.txt
> 
> Hmm... the implementation of wcsftime() in msvcrt seems to be
> completely broken.
> 
> I ran the attached test (localetest.c) and got the following results.
> The point is that wcsftime() returns the same character codes as strftime()
> i.e, the result is not an unicode string :-(
> 
> The bug might be fixed in recently msvcrts in VC2005 or VC2008,
> but at least mingw uses the old broken C runtime.

私はmingwを使っていないのでよくわからないのですが、ランタイムも一緒に
提供しているのですか？

> We'd better to
> use strftime() and multiple conversions to avoid the Microsoft's bug.