Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ABC6502C6 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:52:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69823-06 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:52:08 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.189]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64030650295 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:52:08 -0400 (AST) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e30so596836fke.3 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:52:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=B60EXBN7VxHk0yglN+Bf9AvQL2QcMniD2oBteiXl0u0=; b=nPvRYkFZvjQfmQONv/maFjocHKAq4K7rLjhzaVX9bPEEVpahDkdxvBx1jj5GdAC1ex 4P7DH5MqaQRwml4FbgEPlLyymltitnISHg941HYn0BMvQs45DPdDdS8krJtTFbudCtKs NJJaWWtjWctaQz0TlIbBsbzjOt2WYmBKGOrTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nOlGkIOJYSYZbHcexejmIKbCZvvSZMfjYHhzuTXXAhUDAF34Zbh/aUPMpn66fB5Sqa dWqDjDnyMeS5vmHpsvC0BUoUqeSWmHhkbK/dEBUmT1nW1DawwrzjqRd1hSSx2coRtZ3W SVUJVtOtDjVkuUIIOMppjkCEaSNy0PZstH960= Received: by 10.187.179.4 with SMTP id g4mr1452180fap.24.1227736326456; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.187.221.3 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:52:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <603c8f070811261352ta6da0b8xcbb8aaf87f050e6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:52:06 -0500 From: "Robert Haas" To: "Jaime Casanova" Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 Cc: "Emmanuel Cecchet" , "Nikhil Sontakke" , PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <3073cc9b0811261335q5e35d336i33faa17eede7d417@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3073cc9b0810181308y91deed8wac2df9bc925200f5@mail.gmail.com> <3073cc9b0810220743p11526a74ve9769a416c1707cf@mail.gmail.com> <3073cc9b0810220744y987173avd560a33fcb58ede5@mail.gmail.com> <490B5178.7070600@frogthinker.org> <3073cc9b0811052047o4ebe24b4vd0ab24fd3095d342@mail.gmail.com> <3073cc9b0811261335q5e35d336i33faa17eede7d417@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.41 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.41 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200811/1775 X-Sequence-Number: 128487 > 'cause the great interest this one has (i'm being ironic, just in case > ;) can we safely say this was returned with feedback and remove it > from the list of pending patches? Um... are you referring to lack of interest from the patch author, or from the community? If the patch author is no longer interested in the patch, of course it should be withdrawn. But as for the community, the patch is on the commitfest wiki[1] and you are listed as the reviewer, so I wouldn't necessarily expect anyone else to comment at this point - although, in fact, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote in as well, so I would say you have exactly the opposite of a lack of interest. If you think the patch needs further review from another reviewer, say so. I'm sure someone else can be assigned to do an additional review. If you think the patch is ready to commit, say so, and update the wiki accordingly. ...Robert [1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2008-11