Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBAA6502E4
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:09:49 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 77339-04 for
	<pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:09:45 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB076502AA
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:09:46 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6OH9O6S008024;
	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:09:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
cc: "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <ams@oryx.com>,
	"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	"Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences 
In-reply-to: <3073cc9b0807240917o1b100369lb97a57bf96f818b9@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <c2d9e70e0805221118x1411e00crd7d4aae7e6e4ea3d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080708133244.GB4095@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20080709185837.GA27406@toroid.org>
	<20080709191125.GK3946@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20080710031140.GA427@toroid.org>
	<3073cc9b0807110957w71869487p17fb58cb98abc520@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080712113041.GA25112@toroid.org>
	<3073cc9b0807121232m6b8e6ae0ycaa78d6b8595d39d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080712195237.GA22779@toroid.org>
	<24460.1215895820@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<3073cc9b0807240917o1b100369lb97a57bf96f818b9@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
	message dated "Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:17:07 -0500"
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:09:24 -0400
Message-ID: <8023.1216919364@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200807/1139
X-Sequence-Number: 121399

"Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
>> Another issue is the interaction with the planned column-level GRANT
>> feature.

> Although that is a feature we want, is a WIP one... do we stop patches
> because it can conflict with a project we don't know will be applied
> soon?

Well, considering that that one is implementing a feature required by
SQL spec, your feature will lose any tug-of-war ;-).  So yeah, you
ought to consider how to make yours play nice when (not if) that
happens.

			regards, tom lane