X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52AE52835 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:19:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81309-01 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:19:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.sto.netlight.se (1-1-10-39a.sh.sth.bostream.se [82.182.50.216]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED437528C3 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:19:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from prraxp ([192.168.12.76]) by mail.sto.netlight.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id j5RC8X314165 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:08:33 +0200 From: "Praveen Raja" To: Subject: Insert performance vs Table size Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:24:06 +0200 Message-ID: <001201c57b0a$beb2b780$4c0ca8c0@sto.netlight.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <41821.193.138.218.24.1119696327.squirrel@www.aldratech.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.055 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/491 X-Sequence-Number: 13128 Hi all I'm wondering if and how the size of a table affects speed of inserts into it? What if the table has indexes, does that alter the answer? Thanks