X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAE59FB3A1 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:57:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74666-02-4 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:56:50 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from ns2.nec.com.au (ns2.nec.com.au [147.76.180.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4769FA6B1 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:01:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp1.nec.com.au (unknown [172.31.8.18]) by ns2.nec.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824A63B6B1 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:01:17 +1000 (EST) Received: from eddy (eddy.ssd.neca.nec.com.au [147.76.48.116]) by warp.ssd.neca.nec.com.au (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with SMTP id k7151HuP014061 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:01:17 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: From: "Guoping Zhang" To: Subject: Are there any performance penalty for opposite edian platform combinations.... Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:01:15 +1000 Message-ID: <001401c6b527$85406620$74304c93@eddy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="hz-gb-2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/1 X-Sequence-Number: 20186 Hello, I apologize that if the similar questions were already asked and answered before..... Here is a go: a) If we have application clients running on a Solaris 10/SPARC box and database server running on a Solaris10 X_86 box; further, we have a few tables, in which we split an integer type of field into several our own defined bit map segement, upon them, we have a set of logic operation implemented in our applications, MY question is, could the different edian scheme (SPARC is a big edian and X_86 is the opposite) possibly slow down the applcation? In fact, it is a general question that "Is it a good practice we shall avoid to run application server and database server on the platform with opposite edian? or it simply doesn't matter"? b) Same direction for the question, if using slony-1, if master server is running on a big edian host but slave is running on a small edian host, are there any performance loss due to the edian difference? Thanks in advance for your opinions. Regards, Guoping Zhang