X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624EE9FB267
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:32 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 07366-10 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:21 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from globalrelay.com (mail1.globalrelay.com [216.18.71.77])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936AA9FA304
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:21 -0300 (ADT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Scanned by GRC-AntiVirus Gateway
X-GR-Acctd: YES
Received: from [67.90.96.2] (HELO DaveEMachine)
	by globalrelay.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.3)
	with ESMTP id 104764119; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:02:18 -0700
From: "Dave Dutcher" <dave@tridecap.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Pi=F1eiro'?= <apinheiro@igalia.com>,
	<pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:02:17 -0500
Message-ID: <002801c6d5d4$cd869490$8300a8c0@tridecap.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
In-Reply-To: <1157998456.7540.15.camel@codfix.local.igalia.com>
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.168 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200609/66
X-Sequence-Number: 20752

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org=20
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Pi=F1eiro
> Subject: [PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody

> a week ago we migrate a Woody(postgre 7.2.1) server to Sarge(postgre
> 7.4.7). To migrate the database we use a dump, using pg_dump with this
> options:
> pg_dump -U <username> -c -F p -O -v -f <filename> <DBname>
>=20
> We have a search, that using woody take about 1-2 minutes, but with
> sarge it is executing about 2 hours, and at least it crashes, with a
> message about a temporal file and no more disk space ( i have=20
> more than
> a GB of free disk space).
>=20
> Any idea ?

The first question is did you run ANALYZE on the new database after
importing your data? =20