From: "Christian Paul B. Cosinas" <cpc@cybees.com>
To: <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: FW: Used Memory
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:34:41 -0000
Message-ID: <004001c5e3b0$c5f368a0$1e21100a@ghwk02002147>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcXYSRQEEzZVhwc+RZSn0P4xxglPcQAA3w8wAtkKxYA=

Here are the configuration of our database server:
	port = 5432
	max_connections = 300
	superuser_reserved_connections = 10
	authentication_timeout = 60	
	shared_buffers = 48000   
	sort_mem = 32168
	sync = false

Do you think this is enough? Or can you recommend a better configuration for
my server?

The server is also running PHP and Apache but wer'e not using it
extensively. For development purpose only. 

The database slow down is occurring most of the time (when the memory free
is low) I don't think it has something to do with vacuum. We only have a
full server vacuum once a day.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:markir@paradise.net.nz]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:14 AM
To: Christian Paul B. Cosinas
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Used Memory
>  
> 
> I just noticed that as long as the free memory in the first row (which 
> is 55036 as of now) became low, the slower is the response of the 
> database server.
>  

Also, how about posting your postgresql.conf (or just the non-default
parameters) to this list?


Some other stuff that could be relevant:

- Is the machine just a database server, or does it run (say) Apache + Php?
- When the slowdown is noticed, does this coincide with certain activities -
e.g, backup , daily maintenance, data load(!) etc.


regards

Mark

> 
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html

Nope, not me either.


I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html    


I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html