Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFFF9F9357 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:03:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76887-06 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:03:09 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from mail.refusion.com (mail.refusion.com [213.144.155.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4822A9FA178 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:03:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from iwing by mail.refusion.com (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.9) with ESMTP id md50001634025.msg for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:03:09 +0100 Message-ID: <02ad01c71d35$7374b8d0$6601a8c0@iwing> From: "Thomas H." To: "Axel Waggershauser" Cc: References: <5e66c6e90612080417r23ecaea4p210905f868c26c7f@mail.gmail.com> <5e66c6e90612081724m57293ffdy21d6b45697e69bd4@mail.gmail.com> <3317.1165636358@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5e66c6e90612110658r3c0918f6v4fd3682363db5c15@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Low throughput of binary inserts from windows to linux Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:03:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.2663 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 X-Authenticated-Sender: info@alternize.com X-Spam-Processed: mail.refusion.com, Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:03:09 +0100 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 80.238.234.233 X-Return-Path: me@alternize.com X-Envelope-From: me@alternize.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-ClamAV: Pass X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.106 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, SPF_HELO_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200612/234 X-Sequence-Number: 22290 > I'm out of ideas here, maybe someone could try to reproduce this > behavior or could point me to the thread containing relevant > information (sorry, maybe I'm just too dumb :-/) please specify how you're transfering the data from windows -> linux. are you using odbc? if yes, what driver? are you using FDQN server names or a plain ip adress? etc etc. - thomas