X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7E4D682C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:58:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00654-05 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:58:43 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:20:23.699001 by SQLgrey- Received: from mailer.eglobalreach.net (mail.heliustech.net [202.124.128.22]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD8DD6805 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:58:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from ghwk02002147 (localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by mailer.eglobalreach.net (8.11.6p2/) with ESMTP id j9O1cNK03726 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:38:23 +0800 From: "Christian Paul B. Cosinas" To: Subject: Re: Used Memory Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:42:33 -0000 Message-ID: <02b001c5d83c$34acbba0$1e21100a@ghwk02002147> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C5D83C.34AFC8E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0510210841h568f173ar2fa9ea4a7d105905@mail.gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcXWVwx9TKFORE3pS6yM9N43/8G7SwB5OJ9w X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.958 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.137, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_SBL=1.094] X-Spam-Score: 0.958 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/110 X-Sequence-Number: 15367 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C5D83C.34AFC8E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It affect my application since the database server starts to slow down. Hence a very slow in return of functions. Any more ideas about this everyone? Please.. _____ From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alex Turner Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 3:42 PM To: Jon Brisbin Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Used Memory [snip] to the second processor in my dual Xeon eServer) has got me to the point that the perpetually high memory usage doesn't affect my application server. I'm curious - how does the high memory usage affect your application server? Alex I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you? http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html ------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C5D83C.34AFC8E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

It affect my application since the database server starts to slow down. Hence a very slow in return of = functions.

 

Any more ideas about this = everyone?

 

Please….

From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alex Turner
Sent: Friday, October 21, = 2005 3:42 PM
To: Jon Brisbin
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] = Used Memory

 

[snip]

to the second processor in my dual Xeon eServer) has got me to = the
point that the perpetually high memory usage doesn't affect my
application server.


I'm curious - how does the high memory usage affect your application = server?

Alex

 

 



I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html ------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C5D83C.34AFC8E0--