X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241FADAB85 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53402-01 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:42:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailer.eglobalreach.net (cybees.com [202.124.128.22]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B453DAB4B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ghwk02002147 (localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by mailer.eglobalreach.net (8.11.6p2/) with ESMTP id j9O1gt603929 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:42:55 +0800 From: "Christian Paul B. Cosinas" To: Subject: Re: Used Memory Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:47:05 -0000 Message-ID: <02b501c5d83c$d6bf0f10$1e21100a@ghwk02002147> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B6_01C5D83C.D6BF0F10" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0510210841h568f173ar2fa9ea4a7d105905@mail.gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcXWVwx9TKFORE3pS6yM9N43/8G7SwB5T9QA X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.68 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.629] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/325 X-Sequence-Number: 15093 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02B6_01C5D83C.D6BF0F10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 6192460 6137424 55036 0 85952 5828844 -/+ buffers/cache: 222628 5969832 Swap: 2096472 0 2096472 Here is the result of "free" command" I am talking about. What does this result mean? I just noticed that as long as the free memory in the first row (which is 55036 as of now) became low, the slower is the response of the database server. I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you? http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html ------=_NextPart_000_02B6_01C5D83C.D6BF0F10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

total = = used = = free = = shared = buffers = = cached

Mem: &n= bsp; = 6192460 = 6137424 = 55036 = 0 = &= nbsp; 85952 = = 5828844

-/+ = buffers/cache: = &= nbsp; 222628 = 5969832

Swap: = = 2096472 = 0 &= nbsp; 2096472

Here is the result of = “free” command” I am talking about.

What does this result = mean?

I just noticed that as long as the = free memory in the first row (which is 55036 as of now) became low, the = slower is the response of the database server.

I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html ------=_NextPart_000_02B6_01C5D83C.D6BF0F10--