From: "Mike Sofen" <msofen@runbox.com>
To: "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
	"'Justin Pryzby'" <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: "'Nagaraj Raj'" <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>,
	<pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
References: <20210708221703.GA1301@telsasoft.com>
 <202107082228.obnak7c7mx4n@alvherre.pgsql>
In-Reply-To: <202107082228.obnak7c7mx4n@alvherre.pgsql>
Subject: RE: Partition column should be part of PK
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:12:03 -0700
Message-ID: <080901d7744e$ac0f3d70$042db850$@runbox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQI0b0d+I/SkBI69wtPwH5SCzfQSy6p/vj+A
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/080901d7744e%24ac0f3d70%24042db850%24%40runbox.com>
Precedence: bulk

I believe this thread qualifies for the funniest thread of 2021 (so =
far).  And yes, this is a top post.  :-)

Mike Sofen

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>=20
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2021 3:29 PM
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK

On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
>=20
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why=20
> not reference the old thread ?
>=20
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft
> .com

Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to =
two weeks ago.

--=20
=C3=81lvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  =E2=80=94  =
https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/