Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357DF9FB54A for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:12:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15756-03 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:12:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AB49FB46F for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:12:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5PHC9Om001011; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:12:10 -0400 (EDT) To: Dan Gorman cc: Simon Riggs , "Koichi Suzuki" , "Toru SHIMOGAKI" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PITR Backups In-reply-to: <02E9543C-40A1-4B68-A2D4-7AE591F39D3E@hi5.com> References: <7E0807EE-B970-4869-A248-B838E42AD9EE@hi5.com> <9761.1182472005@sss.pgh.pa.us> <467B3459.9030808@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1182509748.9276.178.camel@silverbirch.site> <467F938F.1030708@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1182777963.9276.582.camel@silverbirch.site> <367.1182789258@sss.pgh.pa.us> <02E9543C-40A1-4B68-A2D4-7AE591F39D3E@hi5.com> Comments: In-reply-to Dan Gorman message dated "Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:04:48 -0700" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:12:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1010.1182791529@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/583 X-Sequence-Number: 25616 Dan Gorman writes: > I didn't however keep the snapshots around. I could try and re-set > this scenario up. I was in the middle of doing some data migration > with Netapp and wanted to just 'test' it to make sure it was sane. > If you guys would like me to try to 'break' it again and keep the db > around for further testing let me know. Yeah, please do. It's not entirely clear whether you've found a bug or not, and it'd be good to determine that ... regards, tom lane