X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2599FA1B0 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09965-09 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:40 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0BD9FA3A6 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AFAbNp001041; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:10:37 -0400 (EDT) To: Michael Glaesemann cc: Chris , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: UNSUBSCRIBE In-reply-to: <7AA3D75C-4821-4B78-A3F7-4ED94B8F85C2@seespotcode.net> References: <44615C15.5040803@gmail.com> <26504.1147238111@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4461787C.3010705@gmail.com> <26692.1147239778@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7AA3D75C-4821-4B78-A3F7-4ED94B8F85C2@seespotcode.net> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Glaesemann message dated "Wed, 10 May 2006 15:14:08 +0900" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:10:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1038.1147273837@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/257 X-Sequence-Number: 19044 Michael Glaesemann writes: > (And are there mail readers out there that can pick those subscribe/ > unsubscribe headers from the list emails? Now *that'd* be sweet.) Well, in my fairly ancient copy of exmh, any message with such headers causes an additional menu to appear: List... help unsubscribe owner subscribe archive id post Clicking on any of these takes you to the webpage referenced by the header. (It looks like it's just generating menu entries for whatever "List-foo" headers it finds; the behavior isn't real helpful for headers that don't contain URLs, but most of these do.) Whether there's anything mass-market that knows about these headers, I dunno, but it's not like the spec hasn't been out there plenty long enough: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2369.txt regards, tom lane