Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFB79FB5B0 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:05:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19079-10 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:05:08 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655699FB205 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:05:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2NF56q5010428; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:05:06 -0400 (EDT) To: "Paolo Negri" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: linux - server configuration for small database In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Paolo Negri" message dated "Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:48:19 -0000" Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:05:06 -0400 Message-ID: <10427.1174662306@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200703/366 X-Sequence-Number: 23771 "Paolo Negri" writes: > The first question I have is, since I'd strongly prefer to use > postgresql 8.1 or 8.2 instead of the 7.4 that comes with redhat, if > someone else is using with success third party rpms with success in > business critical applications. Red Hat does support postgres 8.1 on RHEL4: http://www.redhat.com/appstack/ regards, tom lane