Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWkTk-0008VY-A2 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:01:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWkTi-00081u-8W for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:01:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWkTi-00081n-0y for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:01:46 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWkTd-0004o8-JL for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:01:44 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBBG1Ewt010579; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:01:15 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Greg Clough cc: Mariel Cherkassky , "pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: database crash during pgbench run In-reply-to: References: <28756.1544463896@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Greg Clough message dated "Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:35:20 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <10577.1544544074.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:01:14 -0500 Message-ID: <10578.1544544074@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Greg Clough writes: >>> 2018-12-10 19:11:56 IST 23647 LOG: received fast shutdown request >>> any idea what can cause it ? >> Something sent SIGINT to the postmaster. > My money is on the OoM (Out of Memory) killer. That usually uses SIGKILL. If I had to guess, I'd wonder whether the postmaster was manually started, and if so whether it was properly dissociated from the user's terminal (with nohup or the like). If it wasn't, then a control-C typed at the terminal would SIGINT the postmaster as well as whatever it was meant to terminate. regards, tom lane