X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1317652820
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 May 2005 01:30:16 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 62366-07
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 May 2005 04:30:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (floppy.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420B5281C
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 29 May 2005 01:30:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id BE7A330952; Sun, 29 May 2005 06:26:54 +0200 (MET DST)
From: ellis@no.spam ()
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 04:28:25 -0000
Organization: S.P.C.A.A.
Message-ID: <1117340905.839566@localhost.localdomain>
References: <0C072E7CC947D511AC9600A0CC7341200256CF03@xeon400.tagaudit.com>
	<200505241037.49050.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Originator: ellis@no.spam ()
Cache-Post-Path: localhost.localdomain!unknown@localhost.localdomain
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 11
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200505/446
X-Sequence-Number: 12610

In article <200505241037.49050.josh@agliodbs.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:

>So transaction integrity is not a real concern?

I know of all too many people that consider that to be
true. <sigh> They simply don't understand the problem.

--
http://www.spinics.net/linux/