X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167695290C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:30:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61928-06 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:30:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail0.rawbw.com (mail0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.41]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B23252874 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:30:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail0.rawbw.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) id j530UUL89786 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 198.144.203.173 ([198.144.203.173]) by webmail.rawbw.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:30:30 -0700 Message-ID: <1117758630.429fa4a66825f@webmail.rawbw.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:30:30 -0700 From: mudfoot@rawbw.com To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Adaptec/LSI/?? RAID (what about JBOD?) References: <002601c56725$2bdd2010$0200a8c0@grownups> <1117746123.429f73cb81fed@webmail.rawbw.com> <1117754368.10586.32.camel@lamb.mcmillan.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <1117754368.10586.32.camel@lamb.mcmillan.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 198.144.203.173 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.178 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/56 X-Sequence-Number: 12694 Thanks, Andrew. I expect to choose between HBAs with no RAID functionality or with the option to completely bypass RAID functionality--meaning that I'll hopefully avoid the situation that you've described. I'm mostly curious as to whether the driver problems described for U320 Adaptec RAID controllers also apply to the regular SCSI drivers. Thanks. Quoting Andrew McMillan : > On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 14:02 -0700, mudfoot@rawbw.com wrote: > > I have a similar question about what to choose (either LSI or Adaptec > U320), but > > plan to use them just for JBOD drivers. I expect to be using either net > or > > freebsd. The system CPU will be Opteron. My impression is that both the > ahd > > and mpt drivers (for U320 Adaptec and LSI, respectively) are quite stable, > but > > not from personal experience. Like I said, I don't plan to have the cards > doing > > RAID in hardware. Should I be pretty safe with either choice of HBA > then? > > On the machine I mentioned earlier in this thread we use the Megaraid > for JBOD, but the card setup to use the disks that way was somewhat > confusing, requiring us to configure logical drives that in fact matched > the physical ones. The card still wanted to write that information onto > the disks, reducing the total disk space available by some amount, but > also meaning that we were unable to migrate our system from a previous > non-RAID card cleanly. > > Regards, > Andrew. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington > WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St > DDI: +64(4)803-2201 MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267 > Whereof one cannot speak, thereon one must remain silent. -- Wittgenstein > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >