X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC4E52806 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:07:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61940-01 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:07:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from titan.ecommit.de (titan.ecommit.de [195.145.58.245]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECFA52802 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:07:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from titan.ecommit.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by titan.ecommit.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id j5377Q0A018025 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:07:27 +0200 Received: from titan.ecommit.de (root@localhost) by titan.ecommit.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id j5377QqO018024 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:07:26 +0200 Received: from fandelm.ecommit.de (fandelm.tc.de 192.168.252.51) by titan.ecommit.de (Scalix SMTP Relay 9.0.0.26) via ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:06:41 +0200 From: "Martin Fandel" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1117782401.4380.37.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de> Subject: Filesystem x-scalix-Hops: 1 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.042 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/60 X-Sequence-Number: 12698 Hi @ all, i have only a little question. Which filesystem is preferred for postgresql? I'm plan to use xfs (before i used reiserfs). The reason is the xfs_freeze Tool to make filesystem-snapshots. Is the performance better than reiserfs, is it reliable? best regards, Martin