X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC89528CC for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:04:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83168-08 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:04:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from veggie-fuel.com (veggie-fuel.com [200.46.208.238]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1628E529B3 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:04:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by veggie-fuel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A81435F9DE for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:04:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from veggie-fuel.com ([200.46.208.238]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81961-08; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.0.7] (63-228-143-68.phnx.qwest.net [63.228.143.68]) by veggie-fuel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB4A35F9D6; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:04:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Two queries are better than one? From: Karim Nassar Reply-To: karim.nassar@acm.org To: John A Meinel Cc: Postgresql Performance In-Reply-To: <42E98DDD.5000505@arbash-meinel.com> References: <1122591866.11860.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42E98DDD.5000505@arbash-meinel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:02:13 -0700 Message-Id: <1122602533.11862.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.034 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/452 X-Sequence-Number: 13693 On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 21:01 -0500, John A Meinel wrote: > > Also, did you run it *lots* of times to make sure that this isn't just > noise? If a dozen is lots, yes. :-) It was very consistent as I repeatedly ran it. -- Karim Nassar