X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BDFD7DA5 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:18:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43943-01 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecircle.de (mail.ecircle.de [195.140.186.200]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D8DD7D91 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:18:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (unknown [192.168.1.110]) by mail.ecircle.de (READY) with ESMTP id 2A1D49540FC; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Help tuning postgres From: Csaba Nagy To: emil@baymountain.com Cc: postgres performance list In-Reply-To: <200510121112.11486.emil@baymountain.com> References: <1129128315.2995.174.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de> <200510121112.11486.emil@baymountain.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1129130273.2995.177.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:17:53 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.013 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/209 X-Sequence-Number: 14977 [snip] > Have you tried reindexing your active tables? > Not yet, the db is in production use and I have to plan for a down-time for that... or is it not impacting the activity on the table ? > Emil > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match