X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8B59DC82A
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:54:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 85766-09
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:54:10 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A91549DC807
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:54:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2006 16:54:05 -0000
Received: from 201-24-229-237.ctame704.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br (EHLO
	servidor) [201.24.229.237]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 17:54:05 +0100
X-Authenticated: #15924888
Subject: Use of * affect the performance
From: Marcos <mjs_ops@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:28 +0000
Message-Id: <1137422968.1085.25.camel@servidor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.137 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137]
X-Spam-Score: 0.137
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/202
X-Sequence-Number: 16680

Hi,

I always think that use of * in SELECT affected in the performance,
becoming the search slowest.

But I read in the a Postgres book's that it increases the speed of
search.

And now???? What the more fast?

Thanks