X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576F49DC80A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:23:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59427-04 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:23:10 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from exchange.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com [63.87.162.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD299DC81F for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:23:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from 10.10.1.37 ([10.10.1.37]) by exchange.g2switchworks.com ([10.10.1.2]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:23:09 +0000 Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com; 14 Feb 2006 10:23:09 -0600 Subject: Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS From: Scott Marlowe To: Jay Greenfield Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200602141617.k1EGH8iO021425@timberline.ca> References: <200602141617.k1EGH8iO021425@timberline.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1139934189.22740.184.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:23:09 -0600 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.166 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.165, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.166 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/164 X-Sequence-Number: 17150 On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:17, Jay Greenfield wrote: > Is it possible to configure Postgres to behave like Access - a single user > and use as much of the recourses as required? No. If you want something akin to that, try SQL Lite. it's not as featureful as PostgreSQL, but it's closer to it than Access.