X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9B89DC941
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:45:13 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 66481-03
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:45:14 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from bilbao.pandasoftware.es (unknown [62.14.249.71])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EF69DC93C
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:45:10 -0400 (AST)
Received: from escorpexh05.pandasoftware.local (escorpext02 [192.168.100.182])
	by bilbao.pandasoftware.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9F81B3642
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESCORPEXH03.pandasoftware.local ([172.16.0.70]) by
	escorpexh05.pandasoftware.local with Microsoft
	SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:45:01 +0100
Received: escorpexh03.pandasoftware.local 172.16.0.73 from 172.16.3.16
	172.16.3.16 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944
Received: from pndsoft by escorpexh03.pandasoftware.local;
	28 Feb 2006 10:45:45 +0100
Subject: Different disks for xlogs and data
From: Javier Somoza <jsomoza@pandasoftware.es>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <4402D475.9020505@wildenhain.de>
References: <1141034594.1556.15.camel@pndsoft>
	<4402D0A9.7080705@wildenhain.de> <1141035368.1556.22.camel@pndsoft>
	<4402D475.9020505@wildenhain.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-8k5uspHUYOrOsiH3wgSS"
Message-Id: <1141119945.1555.16.camel@pndsoft>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:45:45 +0100
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2006 09:45:02.0038 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[A550AF60:01C63C4B]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.358 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.356,
	HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
X-Spam-Score: 1.358
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200602/428
X-Sequence-Number: 17414


--=-8k5uspHUYOrOsiH3wgSS
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



	Hi,

	is interesting to do it when using RAID 1+0?

	Thx



--=-8k5uspHUYOrOsiH3wgSS
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.10">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<PRE>

	Hi,

	is interesting to do it when using RAID 1+0?

	Thx

</PRE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-8k5uspHUYOrOsiH3wgSS--