X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4149DCAAD for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:33:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21538-09 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:33:05 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx1.hive.is (scania.ipf.is [85.197.192.147]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 466599DC80E for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:33:01 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 76207 invoked by uid 1009); 10 Mar 2006 09:32:55 -0000 Received: from dsl-216-186.hive.is (HELO ?192.168.1.34?) (85.197.216.186) by mx1.hive.is with SMTP; 10 Mar 2006 09:32:55 -0000 Subject: Re: Process Time X200 From: Ragnar To: NbForYou Cc: Michael Fuhr , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060310085943.GA8913@winnie.fuhr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:35:15 +0000 Message-Id: <1141983315.18656.180.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.144 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144] X-Spam-Score: 0.144 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/111 X-Sequence-Number: 17548 On fös, 2006-03-10 at 10:11 +0100, NbForYou wrote: > Hey Michael, you sure know your stuff! > > Versions: > > PostgreSQL 7.3.9-RH running on the webhost. > PostgreSQL 8.0.3 running on my homeserver. > > So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql? > The question is will he do that? After all a license fee is required for > commercial use. And running a webhosting service is a commercial use. A licence fee for what? Certainly not for postgresql. gnari