X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331179DCA52
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:02:49 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 70969-03
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:02:47 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from exchange.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com
	[63.87.162.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE529DCA2F
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:02:44 -0400 (AST)
Received: from 10.10.1.37 ([10.10.1.37]) by exchange.g2switchworks.com
	([10.10.1.2]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:02:44 +0000
Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com;
	23 Mar 2006 11:02:44 -0600
Subject: Re: Scaling up PostgreSQL in Multiple CPU / Dual Core
From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Jojo Paderes <jojo.paderes@gmail.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <4422D033.2030407@commandprompt.com>
References: <65f9ddfb0603222219r1742c2aevda37acd55ca845be@mail.gmail.com>
	<1143131901.17999.67.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<4422D033.2030407@commandprompt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1143133364.17999.77.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:02:44 -0600
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.144 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
X-Spam-Score: 0.144
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200603/476
X-Sequence-Number: 17913

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:43, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Has someone been working on the problem of splitting a query into pieces
> > and running it on multiple CPUs / multiple machines?  Yes.  Bizgress has
> > done that.  
> 
> I believe that is limited to Bizgress MPP yes?

Yep.  I hope that someday it will be released to the postgresql global
dev group for inclusion.  Or at least parts of it.