X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E5D11F6249 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:12:24 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.12 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EePiZo0-Bj8N for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:11:50 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from my.endian.it (unknown [62.146.87.34]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CDA11F628C for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:05:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dell.home.lan (host14-128.pool8251.interbusiness.it [82.51.128.14]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by my.endian.it (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3AM8Qr13524; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:08:26 +0200 Subject: Re: bad performance on Solaris 10 From: Chris Mair To: Robert Lor Cc: Josh Berkus , Mark Kirkwood , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, llonergan@greenplum.com In-Reply-To: <1144438174.3729.20.camel@dell.home.lan> References: <1144111178.3723.80.camel@dell.home.lan> <1144279780.5133.19.camel@dell.home.lan> <44346DAA.2080905@paradise.net.nz> <200604052135.14326.josh@agliodbs.com> <1144303269.3718.4.camel@dell.home.lan> <4434C505.1000205@sun.com> <1144438174.3729.20.camel@dell.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:05:22 +0200 Message-Id: <1144703122.3686.7.camel@dell.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200604/219 X-Sequence-Number: 18303 > > Chris, > > Just to make sure the x4100 config is similar to your Linux system, can > > you verify the default setting for disk write cache and make sure they > > are both enabled or disabled. Here's how to check in Solaris. > > As root, run "format -e" -> pick a disk -> cache -> write_cache -> display > > > > Not sure how to do it on Linux though! > > > > Regards, > > -Robert > > I don't have access to the machine for the next few days due to eh... > let's call it firewall accident ;), but it might very well be that it > was off on the x4100 (I know it's on the smaller Linux box). > > That together with the bad default sync method can definitely explain > the strangely slow out of box performance I got. > > So thanks again for explaining this to me :) > > Bye, Chris. Just for completeness: I checked now using the above commands and can confirm the write cache was disabled on the x4100 and was on on Linux. Bye, Chris.