X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065229F9C10 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 15:52:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67804-09 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 15:51:58 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from exchange.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com [63.87.162.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A10D9F9B76 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 15:51:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 10.10.1.37 ([10.10.1.37]) by exchange.g2switchworks.com ([10.10.1.2]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 1 May 2006 18:51:55 +0000 Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com; 01 May 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Subject: Re: hardare config question From: Scott Marlowe To: Tom Arthurs Cc: erik.myllymaki@aviawest.com, Mark Lewis , Vivek Khera , Pgsql performance In-Reply-To: <445651F1.9070307@jobflash.com> References: <445236D5.5060509@aviawest.com> <3DFCE70E-E4BB-40AB-B27F-99E90E8159CA@khera.org> <1146246441.15712.41.camel@archimedes> <44564C3F.2040609@aviawest.com> <445651F1.9070307@jobflash.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1146509515.22037.26.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 13:51:55 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/16 X-Sequence-Number: 18803 On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:22, Tom Arthurs wrote: > UPS does not protect against the tech behind the rack unplugging the > power cable, or an accidental power cycle from exercising the wrong > switch. :) Both are probably more common causes of failure than a total > power outage. > > Erik Myllymaki wrote: > > I have been in discussion with 3ware support and after adjusting some > > settings, the 3ware card in RAID 1 gets better performance than the > > single drive. I guess this had everything to do with the write (and > > maybe read?) cache. > > > > Of course now i am in a dangerous situation - using volatile write > > cache without a BBU. > > > > If I were to use a UPS to ensure a soft shutdown in the event of power > > loss, am I somewhat as safe as if I were to purchase a BBU for this > > RAID card? Nor does it prevent an electrician from dropping a tiny piece of wire into a power conditioner, causing a feedback that blows the other two power conditioners, all three industrial UPSes, and the switch that allows the Diesal generator to take over. When that happened to me, I had the only database server in the company to come back up 100% in tact. You can guess by now I also had the only database server with battery backed cache...