Subject: Re: 
From: Ian Westmacott <ianw@intellivid.com>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <20060803191522.GA22878@uio.no>
References: <F0D8A119-F876-4AE5-99DD-79A3CC595003@pervasive.com>
	<20060803191522.GA22878@uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: IntelliVid Corp.
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:30:40 -0400
Message-Id: <1154633440.12111.10.camel@vega.intellivid.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

is that all?

 psql -l | grep 'rows)'
(2016 rows)

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 21:15 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:33:35PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > I'm at a client who's an ASP; they've written their app such that each
> > customer gets their own database. Rigth now they're at nearly 200
> > databases, and were thinking that they "must be the largest PostgreSQL
> > install in the world". :) After taking them down a notch or two, I
> > started wondering how many sites could beat 200 databases in a single
> > cluster. I'm sure there's any number that can, though 200 databases in a
> > cluster certainly isn't mainstream.
> 
> cassarossa:~> psql -h sql -l | grep 'rows)'
> (137 rows)
> 
> That's our measly student society. :-)
> 
> /* Steinar */