X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73B49FCFA3 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:56:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63211-05 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:56:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from exchange.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com [63.87.162.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F569FB209 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:56:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 10.10.1.37 ([10.10.1.37]) by exchange.g2switchworks.com ([10.10.1.2]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:56:46 +0000 Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com; 28 Aug 2006 09:56:46 -0500 Subject: Re: Postgre SQL 7.1 cygwin performance issue. From: Scott Marlowe To: "Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai." Cc: Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Isac Newton A - TLS, Chennai." In-Reply-To: <012301731C23DE4DBFE035647C68F1CC03BE0092@sindhu.ctd.hcltech.com> References: <012301731C23DE4DBFE035647C68F1CC03BE0092@sindhu.ctd.hcltech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1156777006.3932.11.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:56:46 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.079 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/438 X-Sequence-Number: 20623 On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 09:00, Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai. wrote: > Thanks Alvaro. > > We are using PostgreSQL 7.1 cygwin installed on Windows 2000. > > We understand that the maximum connections that can be set is 64 in > Postgresql 7.1 version. > > But our application is installed in 8 / 10 PC or more than that and it opens > multiple connections and it exceeds 64. > > Because of this the subsequent connections are failed to connect with DB > from application. > > Please advise us on how to resolve this ?. As someone else mentioned, pg_pool might help here. But you're kind of fighting an uphill battle here. I'm guessing that your effort will be better spent on upgrading your db server than on trying to patch up the system you have. Is there any chance of changing your client app so it doesn't open so many connections? That would seem the easiest fix of all, if you have access to that code.