X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32BC9FA195 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:48:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71155-09 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:48:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from smtp-msa-out19.orange.fr (smtp19.orange.fr [80.12.242.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309E39FA15C for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:48:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (LSt-Amand-152-32-6-178.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.127.21.178]) by mwinf1903.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 73B381C000A7; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:48:45 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20060914214845473.73B381C000A7@mwinf1903.orange.fr Subject: Re: High CPU Load From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= BENOIS To: Guillaume Smet Cc: Scott Marlowe , Dave Dutcher , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Xavier Milliard In-Reply-To: <1d4e0c10609141422o57ecf28eobf3d0b7594bb242f@mail.gmail.com> References: <004001c6d80e$bdef5bc0$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> <1158249411.24726.17.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <1158268058.5167.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1d4e0c10609141422o57ecf28eobf3d0b7594bb242f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gDqQ62PE0o9w0XHq7Lgp" Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:48:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1158270523.5167.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.02 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/178 X-Sequence-Number: 20864 --=-gDqQ62PE0o9w0XHq7Lgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guillaume, Le jeudi 14 septembre 2006 =C3=A0 23:22 +0200, Guillaume Smet a =C3=A9crit = : > J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me, >=20 > Perhaps it's a stupid question but are your queries slower than > before? You didn't tell it. No, it's not stupid question ! Yes queries speed but when the load average exceeds 40 all queries are slow= er than before. > IMHO, it's not a problem to have a high load if you have a lot of > users and your queries are fast (and with 8.1, they should be far > faster than before). Yes i have a lot of users ;-) >=20 > To take a real example, we had a problem with a quad xeon running > postgres 7.4 and even when there were a lot of queries, the load was > always lower than 4 and suddenly the queries were really slow and the > database was completely unusable. > When we upgraded to 8.1, on very high load, we had a far higher cpu > load but queries were far faster even with a high cpu load. I agree but by moment DB Server is so slow. > Considering your top output, I suspect you use HT and you should > really remove it if it's the case. what's means "HT" please ? > -- > Guillaume If you want, my JabberId : jerome.benois AT gmail.com --=20 J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me, python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for p in 'sioneb@gnireenigne-aigra.rf'.split('@')])" --=-gDqQ62PE0o9w0XHq7Lgp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFCc46CDKlmlhpwnERAv1yAJ4tY4uEgp/xEiJJ5CKYBELoWIxumgCfS+Cv Zae7Bsk68nUaU3xTkxwLUA4= =65/l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gDqQ62PE0o9w0XHq7Lgp--