Subject: Re: SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS in POSTGRESQL / Some one can
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
Cc: marcosborges@mbsi.com.br, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <457CD182.7020004@gmail.com>
References: <457814D3.1030001@mbsi.com.br>  <457CD182.7020004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:04:38 -0800
Message-Id: <1165809878.19970.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 14:33 +1100, Chris wrote:
> Marcos Borges wrote:
> > 07/12/2006 04:31
> > *SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS in POSTGRESQL*
> > 
> > In mysqln i m using the command SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS in follow sintax.
> > SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS name, email, tel FROM mytable WHERE name <> 
> > '' LIMIT 0, 10
> > to have the recorset data.
> > and
> > SELECT FOUND_ROWS();
> > to have the total of registers found.
> > 
> > I dont want to use the command count(*), because the performance will 
> > fall down, depending of the quantyt of tables and "joins".
> > 
> > The Data base postgresql have something similar ???
> 
> Nope, you're out of luck sorry. That's a mysql-ism and I doubt postgres 
> will ever include something similar.

Your language will have a similar binding. Something like pg_numrows.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate