Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B399F9C35 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:12:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61632-09 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:12:08 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (floppy.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527119F939E for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:12:10 -0400 (AST) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id 232B430DF1; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:12:09 +0100 (MET) From: "oliver@obeattie.com" X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: What you would consider as heavy traffic? Date: 23 Dec 2006 00:12:03 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 10 Message-ID: <1166861522.996580.25870@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.153.27.57; posting-account=AVn3qw0AAABSRmll0nhUMxXhnylfTWo0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200612/526 X-Sequence-Number: 22582 Hey Everyone, I am having a bit of trouble with a web host, and was wondering as what you would class as a high level of traffic to a database (queries per second) to an average server running postgres in a shared hosting environment (very modern servers). Many Thanks in Advance, Oliver