Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032A29FB262 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:28:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94022-04 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:28:02 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A349FB22F for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:28:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CC57FDBF; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:28:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.211]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:28:02 -0500 Received: by web2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D08331F10E; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:28:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1169051281.3778.1169737659@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: jcmIFeyRgd0HO3SkVdmJGhz6vTcs+MXzcsIzL7pY7GOl 1169051281 From: "Jeremy Haile" To: "Scott Marlowe" Cc: "Chad Wagner" , "Tom Lane" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <1168982580.8275.1169588211@webmail.messagingengine.com> <26412.1168983547@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1168986053.16393.1169598917@webmail.messagingengine.com> <81961ff50701161444l3f932755m5a6e15ad2d948130@mail.gmail.com> <1169002739.19758.1169636285@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1169012767.6271.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1169044649.19974.1169715743@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1169050746.9586.44.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Subject: Re: PG8.2.1 choosing slow seqscan over idx scan In-Reply-To: <1169050746.9586.44.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:28:01 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/261 X-Sequence-Number: 22862 > That's about 32% dead rows. Might be worth scheduling a vacuum full, > but it's not like I was afraid it might be. It looks to me like you > could probably use a faster I/O subsystem in that machine though. I'll try to schedule a full vacuum tonight. As far as I/O - it's using SAN over fiber. Not as fast as internal SCSI though...