Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86E79FB9F4 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:33:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23338-08 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:33:35 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: delayed 00:21:34.271872 by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1191C9FB94D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:33:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74E1E7EF5 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:12:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from web1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.210]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:12:00 -0500 Received: by web1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2B70B47BB1; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:12:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1172581920.28858.1176750095@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 0LNHqpYJPAvjLKiBFLCHRqnnlZSSvn2C2jbUuQU7tMpW 1172581920 From: "Joe Uhl" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Opinions on Raid Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:12:00 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.07 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=BAYES_50, SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200702/319 X-Sequence-Number: 23373 We have been running Postgres on a 2U server with 2 disks configured in raid 1 for the os and logs and 4 disks configured in raid 10 for the data. I have since been told raid 5 would have been a better option given our usage of Dell equipment and the way they handle raid 10. I have just a few general questions about raid with respect to Postgres: [1] What is the performance penalty of software raid over hardware raid? Is it truly significant? We will be working with 100s of GB to 1-2 TB of data eventually. [2] How do people on this list monitor their hardware raid? Thus far we have used Dell and the only way to easily monitor disk status is to use their openmanage application. Do other controllers offer easier means of monitoring individual disks in a raid configuration? It seems one advantage software raid has is the ease of monitoring. I truly appreciate any assistance or input. As an additional question, does anyone have any strong recommendations for vendors that offer both consulting/training and support? We are currently speaking with Command Prompt, EnterpriseDB, and Greenplum but I am certainly open to hearing any other recommendations. Thanks, Joe