Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928429FB65A
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:58:46 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 33863-03 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:58:34 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795769FB5F7
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:58:34 -0400 (AST)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id D177030909; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:58:32 +0100 (MET)
From: "hatman" <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: performances with Pentium D
Date: 28 Feb 2007 07:58:14 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <1172678294.544317.195100@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060607
	Debian/1.7.12-1.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 proxy-1.heig-vd.ch:8080 (squid/2.5.STABLE4)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.134.216.146;
	posting-account=gnwH_QwAAAAQLNv14JlAW4Wgi-SQgnth
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=BAYES_50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200703/102
X-Sequence-Number: 23507

Hi all,

Do someone already had some problem with performances using a pentium
D (64 bits) and postgres 8.2.3 on a redhat enterprise update 2 ?
I did the install from sources and nothing change... I have a RAID 0
for data and 3Gb of RAM and my inserts rate is quite low, 8333 inserts/
sec (lower than on my laptop which is 10526 inserts/sec).
I suspect a problem with the CPU because using gkrellm, the use of 1
CPU is always quite low... Is it normal ?

Many thanks for your help,


Jo=EBl