Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76A89FB3E8 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:45:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96785-07 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:45:42 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:27:11.906371 by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DEB9FBEE2 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:45:50 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.3 Received: from mail.news-companeo.fr (mail.news-companeo.fr [91.121.4.200]) by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8285AF884 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (dom6 [192.168.20.6]) by mail.news-companeo.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FAA1703E0 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.news-companeo.fr ([192.168.20.5]) by localhost (ns37436.ovh.net [192.168.20.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eiivhf+SbDEl for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marge.COMPANEO.local (mail.companeo.com [82.228.133.159]) by mail.news-companeo.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046441703D2 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from homer.COMPANEO.local ([192.168.0.110]) by marge.COMPANEO.local with InterScan VirusWall; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:29:35 +0200 Received: from 192.168.0.12 ([192.168.0.12]) by homer.COMPANEO.local ([192.168.0.110]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:29:38 +0000 Received: from phil by 192.168.0.110; 11 Jul 2007 16:16:39 +0200 Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark From: Philippe Amelant To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20070709155954.1B20F78D85@fx8.security-mail.net> References: <20070709155954.1B20F78D85@fx8.security-mail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:16:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1184163398.16023.103.camel@phil.companeo.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200707/85 X-Sequence-Number: 25769 am I wrong or DB2 9.1 is faster on less powerfull hardware ? Le lundi 09 juillet 2007 =C3=A0 11:57 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah a =C3=A9crit : > Hello all, >=20 > I think this result will be useful for performance discussions of=20 > postgresql against other databases. >=20 > http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/ >=20 > More on Josh Berkus's blog: >=20 > http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/postgresql-publishes-fi= rst-real-benchmark-17470 >=20 > Regards, > Jignesh >=20 >=20 > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend