Subject: Re: Index files
From: Philippe Amelant <pamelant@companeo.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <1189739389.22645.24.camel@neuromancer.home.net>
References: <a199704d0709131950i3c23ea35wb0a19f393533197e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1189738644.22645.14.camel@neuromancer.home.net>
	<a199704d0709132003l5e2bd0cweb3d045c038493bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1189739389.22645.24.camel@neuromancer.home.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:34:13 +0200
Message-Id: <1189758853.28660.45.camel@phil.companeo.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0

Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007 =C3=A0 11:09 +0800, Ow Mun Heng a =C3=A9crit =
:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:33 +0530, Harsh Azad wrote:
> > ah.. thanks. Didn't realize table spaces can be mentioned while
> > creating a index. BTW, are soft links ok to use for pg_clog /
> > pg_xlog . I moved the existing directories to /mnt/logs/pglogs and
> > made soft links for both directories in $PGDATA=20
>=20
>=20
> No idea what is the "proper" solution. Me being a newbie itself.
> But from what I've read on the net and google, symlink seems to be the
> order of the day.
>=20
> perhaps others who are more familiar can comment as I'm lost in this.
> (I'm doing symlinking btw)
>=20

You can also mount a different fs on another disk array in pglogs

I thinks update to index are not written to the wal so having index on a
different tablespace should reduce read and write on the data
tablespace, am I wrong ?


>=20
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend