Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1386A2E00D9 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:12:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98036-01 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:12:32 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: delayed 00:29:24.111736 by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from flame.co.za (sharon.co.za [160.124.170.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4702E00AE for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:12:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.138] (196-209-62-7-rrba-esr-3.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.209.62.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by flame.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484FA8016B for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:43:02 +0200 (SAST) Subject: PostgreSQL performance on a virtual host From: Theo Kramer Reply-To: theo@flame.co.za To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Flame Computing Enterprises cc Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:43:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1204645380.2406.18.camel@localhost6.localdomain6> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/52 X-Sequence-Number: 29006 Hi We are thinking of running a PostgreSQL instance on a virtual host under Xen. Any thoughts for/against running PostgreSQL on a virtual host would be much appreciated. -- Regards Theo