X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA24411F6791 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:04:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61346-03 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:04:06 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397C111F67D7 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:04:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k35J443A012501; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:04:04 -0400 (EDT) To: "Juan Casero \(FL FLC\)" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 In-reply-to: <7583B3F1891CC0429FA4A44952AA539C66FA2C@wfm-exchprd2.wfm.pvt> References: <7583B3F1891CC0429FA4A44952AA539C66FA2C@wfm-exchprd2.wfm.pvt> Comments: In-reply-to "Juan Casero \(FL FLC\)" message dated "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:12:54 -0500" Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:04:04 -0400 Message-ID: <12500.1144263844@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.114 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114] X-Spam-Score: 0.114 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200604/61 X-Sequence-Number: 18145 "Juan Casero \(FL FLC\)" writes: > ... This box has a single Ultrasparc T1 cpu with six execution > piplelines that can each handle 4 threads. With the Unix top utility > the postgresql server appears to bounce around between the available > threads on the system. Try sending it more than one query at a time? If you're testing with just one client connection issuing queries, that's about what I'd expect. regards, tom lane