Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB8B9FB60E
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:38:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 75383-01 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:38:16 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0F89FB5B2
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:38:15 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3D4cBBC012737;
	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:38:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Steve <cheetah@tanabi.org>
cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>,
	PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance 
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0704122354430.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org> 
References: <57271CC2-BCB1-4ACA-A177-4FF64F1BC33F@brandeis.edu>
	<16E9A17C-ADFA-43B2-B7EA-5C7A4D7E96D1@event-s.net>
	<E1Hc0lc-0001iE-La@elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<0914C05F-BA1B-4A6C-A1B1-52256BC851A4@event-s.net>
	<1176396964.13754.16.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704121000570.32187@glacier.frostconsultingllc.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704121653030.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<1176414724.13754.23.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704121804000.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<1176416077.13754.26.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<9833.1176418809@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704121855300.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<10117.1176420763@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704121928440.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<10355.1176422445@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704122001160.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<10503.1176423606@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704122025450.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org>
	<12360.1176436194@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704122354430.17955@kit! tyhawk.tanabi.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Steve <cheetah@tanabi.org>
	message dated "Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:55:00 -0400"
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:38:11 -0400
Message-ID: <12736.1176439091@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200704/290
X-Sequence-Number: 24167

Steve <cheetah@tanabi.org> writes:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm still not having any luck reproducing the failure here.  Grasping at
>> straws again, I wonder if it's got something to do with the order in
>> which the planner examines the indexes --- which is OID order.  Could
>> you send me the results of

> Here you go:

Nope, still doesn't fail for me.  [ baffled and annoyed... ]  There must
be something about your situation that's relevant but we aren't
recognizing it.  Are you in a position to let me ssh into your machine
and try to debug it?  Or other options like sending me a dump of your
database?   I'm about out of steam for tonight, but let's talk about it
off-list tomorrow.

			regards, tom lane