Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371C3632927 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:19:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08102-03 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:19:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324F4632992 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:19:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE88D348036; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ab6OGCTgzcT; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-28-211.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.28.211]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4A5B348035; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AF706E652; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:19:16 -0400 (CLT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Tom Lane , Max Williams , lacey.powers , PostgreSQL-development , Joshua D. Drake Subject: Re: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4? From: Alvaro Herrera To: Bruce Momjian In-reply-to: <201006131400.o5DE0GT13564@momjian.us> References: <201006131400.o5DE0GT13564@momjian.us> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:19:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1276528580-sup-9020@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.906 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/815 X-Sequence-Number: 164445 Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of dom jun 13 10:00:16 -0400 2010: > Why have I received no reply to this email? Do people think this is not > a serious issue? I know it is a weekend but the problem was identified > on Thursday, meaning there was a full workday for someone from > CommandPrompt to reply to the issue and report a status: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00165.php The packager did reply to the original inquiry *on the same day*, but the moderator has not approved that email yet, it seems. I do have the reply on my mbox, with CC: pgsql-performance. -- Álvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support