Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D968632449 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:49:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07780-01 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:49:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD2A63226D for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:49:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7UGnfAd012838; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:49:41 -0400 (EDT) To: Gerhard Wiesinger cc: Pavel Stehule , Andreas Kretschmer , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 In-reply-to: References: <20100830072230.GA28373@tux> <11111.1283185373@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Gerhard Wiesinger message dated "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:45:26 +0200" Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:49:41 -0400 Message-ID: <12837.1283186981@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/333 X-Sequence-Number: 40176 Gerhard Wiesinger writes: > BTW: I have the old data setup. /var/lib/pgsql-old. Is there a fast setup > with old version on different TCP port possible to compare query plans? You'll need to reinstall the old executables. If you put the new executables in the same directories, it's not going to be easy to run both in parallel. If you didn't, then you just need to start the old postmaster using a different port number.