Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7E51337A5D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:23:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87038-08 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:23:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D31C133798E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:23:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHUYk-00030V-V5 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:23:38 -0700 Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:23:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Rishabh Kumar Jain To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1304486618898-4369082.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <361406.75324.qm@web137010.mail.in.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Order of tables MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.864 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=1.63, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RFC_ABUSE_POST=0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01, URI_HEX=1.122 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/39 X-Sequence-Number: 43548 Thanks for previous reply my friend. In what manner are explicit joins added to improve performence? Are there some rules for it? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Order-of-tables-tp4346077p4369082.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.